<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I might stand corrected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sanft.com/2008/09/24/i-might-stand-corrected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sanft.com/2008/09/24/i-might-stand-corrected/</link>
	<description>Where my opinion counts more!  ;)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:17:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The superball effect - mark my words! &#187; Official Sanft.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.sanft.com/2008/09/24/i-might-stand-corrected/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>The superball effect - mark my words! &#187; Official Sanft.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanft.com/?p=170#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] I have been thinking a lot about the economy and what has been happening on the financial markets.  For my few devoted readers, you may recall my post two weeks ago related to FAS 157 and why we are in a financial death spiral (READ IT HERE). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have been thinking a lot about the economy and what has been happening on the financial markets.  For my few devoted readers, you may recall my post two weeks ago related to FAS 157 and why we are in a financial death spiral (READ IT HERE). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Sanft</title>
		<link>http://www.sanft.com/2008/09/24/i-might-stand-corrected/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Sanft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanft.com/?p=170#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Actually, I have been doing research on this.  The current foreclosure rate is not nearly as high as we have been lead to believe.  The current rate is around 2% and it has been as high as 3.5% in the last 20 years.  

I certainly agree that the banks should be penalized for loaning money irresponsibly, however if you really dig into the detail of FAS 157, it is pretty clear WHY the banks are being forced to take huge write downs.  BofA did not have billions of dollars in loans default, BofA&#039;s portfolio was devalued due to FAS 157.

I am hesitant to drag McCain into this (frankly, I did not catch the news last night).  He is a part of this, but he really has no more power than 99 other senators at this point.

As far as the Venture Capitalists are concerned, since most of their money is in private equity, a bailout does not have a  direct correlation with them except they own private companies that will be impacted by a financial downturn (just like everyone else in the country)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I have been doing research on this.  The current foreclosure rate is not nearly as high as we have been lead to believe.  The current rate is around 2% and it has been as high as 3.5% in the last 20 years.  </p>
<p>I certainly agree that the banks should be penalized for loaning money irresponsibly, however if you really dig into the detail of FAS 157, it is pretty clear WHY the banks are being forced to take huge write downs.  BofA did not have billions of dollars in loans default, BofA&#8217;s portfolio was devalued due to FAS 157.</p>
<p>I am hesitant to drag McCain into this (frankly, I did not catch the news last night).  He is a part of this, but he really has no more power than 99 other senators at this point.</p>
<p>As far as the Venture Capitalists are concerned, since most of their money is in private equity, a bailout does not have a  direct correlation with them except they own private companies that will be impacted by a financial downturn (just like everyone else in the country)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sanft</title>
		<link>http://www.sanft.com/2008/09/24/i-might-stand-corrected/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sanft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanft.com/?p=170#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Now McCain is trying to take the high road. He is going to postpone the debate so he can work on the financial bailout. He has not been involved involved in the discussions before. He is trying to pretend he knows something about economics. I have really lost a lot of respect for the man in the last 4 weeks.

The venture capitalists have a lot of gain if the bailout happens. It is not really as simple as they make it out. A lot of people made loans that they should not have made. A lot of companies decided since the house prices were going up there was no risk to those loans and decided to insure them to make some &quot;free&quot; money on premiums. I am not an accountant but most of the loans are sold to investors so the banks do not have them assets anyway so they do not follow under those rules.

I would like to see the bailout happen with a package to include new regulations. GW is not known for following through on his plans to overhaul the system. I am not saying there has to be a ton of regulation but when you are loaning money to people without proof of income -- that is criminal and should not be rewards. I had to have tax returns and check stubs when I applied for my loans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now McCain is trying to take the high road. He is going to postpone the debate so he can work on the financial bailout. He has not been involved involved in the discussions before. He is trying to pretend he knows something about economics. I have really lost a lot of respect for the man in the last 4 weeks.</p>
<p>The venture capitalists have a lot of gain if the bailout happens. It is not really as simple as they make it out. A lot of people made loans that they should not have made. A lot of companies decided since the house prices were going up there was no risk to those loans and decided to insure them to make some &#8220;free&#8221; money on premiums. I am not an accountant but most of the loans are sold to investors so the banks do not have them assets anyway so they do not follow under those rules.</p>
<p>I would like to see the bailout happen with a package to include new regulations. GW is not known for following through on his plans to overhaul the system. I am not saying there has to be a ton of regulation but when you are loaning money to people without proof of income &#8212; that is criminal and should not be rewards. I had to have tax returns and check stubs when I applied for my loans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
